Parenting Orders: Time With Children vs Parental Responsibility. What is the difference?

In family law, parenting orders regulate arrangements for children after separation. This includes:

  1. “Time with children”(sometimes described as “spending time” and “living with”); and
  1. “Parental responsibility” (decision-making power regarding major long-term issues).

A parent may have substantial time with a child but limited parental responsibility (or vice versa), depending on what the Court considers to be in the child’s best interests.

Throughout family law proceedings, parents are encouraged to reach mutual agreement on children’s matters to minimise court intervention.

 

What are parenting orders?

Parenting orders are orders made by the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia dealing with children. They can cover matters such as:

  • who the child lives with;
  • who the child spends time with and communicates with (and how);
  • allocation of parental responsibility for major long-term decisions;
  • changeover arrangements and travel;
  • conditions designed to manage risk (for example, supervision or injunctions).

Parenting orders may be sought by a child’s parents and, in appropriate cases, by other persons concerned with the child’s care, welfare or development (for example, grandparents).

 

The Court’s considerations

When making parenting orders, the Court’s paramount consideration is the best interests of the child.

In practical terms, the Court considers matters such as:

  • the child’s safety, including any history or risk of family violence or abuse;
  • the child’s developmental, emotional and practical needs;
  • the capacity of each parent (and other relevant carers) to meet those needs;
  • the benefit to the child of maintaining meaningful relationships (where safe) with both parents and significant others;
  • any views expressed by the child, taking into account the child’s maturity and circumstances.

Importantly, the Court does not determine parenting matters by allocating “fault” for the relationship breakdown. Allegations such as infidelity are usually irrelevant unless they bear on the child’s welfare or safety.

 

Time with children (living with / spending time / communication)

Time with children concerns the child’s day-to-day arrangements and the schedule for:

  • where the child lives;
  • when the child spends time with each parent (weekdays, weekends, holidays, special occasions);
  • how the child communicates when not in a parent’s care (telephone, video calls, messages).

There is no legal presumption that parents will have equal time. Any time arrangement must be workable and, most critically, safe and in the child’s best interests.

 

Age and attachment can be relevant

For very young children, the Court may consider:

  • the child’s primary attachment and routine;
  • the child’s ability to tolerate changeovers and overnights;
  • each parent’s demonstrated capacity to manage the child’s day-to-day care.

 

Family violence and risk management

Where there are allegations or findings of family violence, the Court may make protective orders affecting time, for example:

  • supervised time (supervision by an agreed family member or at a professional supervision service);
  • orders limiting or structuring changeovers (including changeover at a contact centre or via third parties);
  • injunctions restraining derogatory comments or harmful conduct in the child’s presence.

These measures are used to balance (where possible) the child’s benefit of a relationship with both parents against the need to ensure the child’s physical and psychological safety.

 

Parental responsibility (decision-making power)

Parental responsibility refers to the duties, powers and authority parents have in relation to their children. In parenting matters, the key focus is often on decision-making about major long-term issues, which typically include:

  • education (including school choice);
  • major health decisions;
  • the child’s name;
  • religious and cultural upbringing;
  • changes to living arrangements that make it significantly harder for the child to spend time with the other parent.

 

Separate from “time”

Parental responsibility is not the same as day-to-day care. For example, a parent may “spend time” with a child and make routine decisions during that time (meals, bedtime, ordinary activities) without necessarily holding equal authority over major long-term decisions.

 

Equal parental responsibility: when it applies, and when it may not

Historically, Australian family law operated with a presumption in favour of equal shared parental responsibility in many cases. However, where there are concerns such as family violence, abuse, or serious welfare risks, the Court may find that equal shared decision-making is inappropriate.

Depending on the evidence, the Court may make orders for:

  • sole parental responsibility (one parent makes major long-term decisions); or
  • allocated parental responsibility for specific issues (for example, one parent has sole parental responsibility for health, while other issues remain joint).

Parenting matters can be complex and have a significant impact on you, your children and your former partner. It is important to have a comprehensive agreement in place to provide clarity and certainty for the whole family.

For more information or to discuss your options, contact our experienced family law team at mail@redhale.com.au or call us on 02 9587 3866.

Binding Financial Agreements (BFAs) after Separation

What Is a Binding Financial Agreement (BFA) and What Is It For?

A Binding Financial Agreement (BFA) is a private, legally binding agreement that allows couples to decide in advance how their assets, property, and finances will be divided if their relationship breaks down. BFAs can be made before entering into a marriage or de facto relationship, during the relationship, or after it ends. These agreements provide clarity, reduce uncertainty, and can help avoid disputes by setting agreed terms for property division, spousal maintenance, superannuation, and other financial matters.

The agreement can cover:

  • How property, savings, and investments will be divided
  • What happens to business interests
  • How debts and liabilities are managed
  • Arrangements for spousal maintenance
  • Financial protection for children of the relationship, or children of previous relationships

A properly drafted BFA offers peace of mind by giving both parties certainty about their financial future, regardless of how circumstances may change.

 

Why Consider a BFA After Separation?

Following separation, many couples seek a clear and final resolution of their financial relationship. A Binding Financial Agreement (BFA) can be a practical way to achieve a clean financial break, allowing both individuals to move forward without ongoing financial obligations or the possibility of further claims.

A solicitor may recommend a BFA over consent orders in certain situations, including:

  • Flexibility: BFAs can allow for arrangements or terms that may not fall within the standard scope of consent orders. For example, they might address future financial arrangements or unique property matters specific to the parties’ circumstances.
  • Efficiency: While consent orders, once filed with the Court, are legally binding and enforceable, the process involves further steps in preparing documents and awaiting court approval. In comparison, a BFA may allow parties to resolve their financial matters in a shorter timeframe, as it does not require court lodgement or approval (although it must still adhere to strict legal requirements to be valid).
  • Tailored Solutions: In complex or out-of-the-ordinary financial situations, a BFA may provide a greater degree of customisation and flexibility than the court would generally permit in consent orders.

 

What Can Go Wrong with a BFA?

For a BFA to be valid under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), it must meet strict legal requirements. If these requirements are not followed, the agreement may not be enforceable. The common pitfalls include:

  • Not receiving independent legal advice for each party
  • Failing to fully disclose all assets and debts
  • Signing under pressure, duress, or without true consent
  • Not meeting formal requirements, such as having the agreement in writing and signed by both parties, with attached certificates of legal advice

Even if a BFA is signed, the court can set it aside for reasons such as:

  • One party was coerced or pressured into signing
  • There was fraud, for example, by hiding assets or giving false information
  • The agreement is considered seriously unfair or unconscionable

 

Why Proper Drafting Matters

A well-prepared BFA ensures clarity and security for both parties and significantly reduces the risk of future disputes. It is essential to obtain proper legal advice and follow the correct legal process so your agreement is valid, compliant, and enforceable. 

For more information on drafting valid and effective Binding Financial Agreements contact our experienced family law team. We ensure that every agreement is tailored to your circumstances and fully compliant with all legal requirements, giving you confidence and security for the future.

 

For more information or to discuss your options, contact our experienced family law team at mail@redhale.com.au or call us on 02 9587 3866.

This article was written by Philip Todorovski, Solicitor, Redmond Hale Simpson.

What to Do After Separation: Achieving a Clean Financial Break

Do I need to Disclose That? - Family Law

Understanding the Need for a Clean Break

After the breakdown of a marriage or de facto relationship, it is important to address the division of assets, property, and financial matters as soon as practicable. Finalising financial settlements not only provides certainty for both parties but also prevents future disputes and financial claims. In Australia, the law is designed to allow parties to achieve a “clean break,” meaning that financial ties between former partners are brought to an end.

 

The Importance of Formalising Your Financial Settlement

Relying on informal agreements or private arrangements can carry significant legal risks. Unless your property settlement is formalised through legally recognised processes, such as Consent Orders or a Binding Financial Agreement (BFA), either party can make further claims, sometimes years later. Formal documents give legal effect to your agreement, ensuring it is enforceable and providing peace of mind for the future.

 

Your Main Options: Consent Orders vs. Binding Financial Agreements

There are two main ways to formalise a property settlement in Australia: Consent Orders and Binding Financial Agreements. Each option has distinct features, advantages, and considerations.

 

Consent Orders

Consent Orders are made via an application to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia. This application will include your financial positions, how you both wish to divide the assets and liabilities, and any supporting documents. Once approved by the Court, the Consent Orders are legally binding and enforceable. The orders can cover property division, superannuation, spousal maintenance, and if appropriate – parenting arrangements.

Key features:

  • Recognised and enforceable as Court orders
  • The Court will only approve Consent Orders if they consider the agreement to be “just and equitable”
  • Provide finality and prevent future claims once made

 

Binding Financial Agreements (BFAs)

A Binding Financial Agreement (BFA) is a private agreement between partners, including former partners. It allows parties to reach their own agreement about how to divide assets and liabilities, without the need for court involvement.

Key features:

  • Do not require court approval or lodgement
  • Each party must receive independent legal advice before signing
  • Offers greater flexibility
  • Must strictly comply with legal requirements to be valid and enforceable
  • Provide certainty and can achieve a clean break if properly drafted

 

Which Option Is Right for You?

The choice between Consent Orders and a BFA will depend on your circumstances, the complexity of your financial arrangements, your level of cooperation, and your preferences regarding cost, and timing. In all cases, it is essential to obtain professional legal advice to ensure your agreement is legally effective and that your interests are protected.

 

Next Steps

If you have recently separated, consider seeking legal advice as soon as possible to discuss your options and time limits for property settlement. Taking prompt action can safeguard your position and help ensure a smooth transition to your next chapter.

Our team has extensive experience advising on property settlement after separation. We assist clients with Consent Orders, Binding Financial Agreements, and tailored solutions to suit your needs through all family law matters, ensuring every agreement is fully compliant and provides the confidence of a clean financial break.

For more information or to discuss your options, contact our experienced family law team at mail@redhale.com.au or call us on 02 9587 3866.

This article was written by Philip Todorovski, Solicitor, Redmond Hale Simpson.

Add Your Heading Text Here